instagram.com
Solid. A couple of things could still be tighter. 2 items below, ordered by how much inbox they are costing you. Measured 0s ago from public DNS in 149 ms.
Fix these, in this order, or hand the list to your agent
ranked by impactSelector smtpapi._domainkey is under 2048 bits, which some receivers already downgrade.
Do this: rotate to a 2048-bit key at the sending service.
dmarc.facebookmail.com has not published instagram.com._report._dmarc.dmarc.facebookmail.com, so receivers will discard aggregate reports sent there.
Do this: ask the report provider to publish the authorisation record, or use an address on your own domain.
Records found
10 mxb-00082601.gslb.pphosted.com
20 mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com
20 mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com
Fix this with your AI agent
AGENT-READYA prompt built only from what was measured: the records as published, 2 tasks in order, exact record values, guardrails, and how to verify. Paste it into Claude, Cursor, Copilot or ChatGPT.
# Fix email authentication for instagram.com You are working on the DNS and mail configuration for instagram.com. Measured by MailAuthWatch on 17 Oct 2026 from public DNS. Grade A (95/100). Report: https://www.mailauthwatch.com/check/instagram.com ## What is published right now (do not assume anything else) - SPF (TXT instagram.com): v=spf1 include:facebookmail.com include:_spf.fb.com -all — valid, 6 of 10 lookups - DMARC (TXT _dmarc.instagram.com): v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:a@dmarc.facebookmail.com; pct=100 - DKIM: smtpapi._domainkey (1024-bit) - MX: mxa-00082601.gslb.pphosted.com, mxb-00082601.gslb.pphosted.com, mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com, mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com → Proofpoint - Nameservers: a.ns.instagram.com, b.ns.instagram.com … → DNS host not recognised ## Tasks, in order of impact …
Grade history
SPF OK
v=spf1 include:facebookmail.com include:_spf.fb.com -all
- DNS lookups
- 6 of 10 allowed
- Final mechanism
-all
- OK No problems detected.
Include tree
6 / 10DKIM OK
DKIM selectors cannot be listed from DNS, so 79 selectors used by common providers were probed.
| Selector | Key | Record |
|---|---|---|
smtpapi | RSA 1024-bit Weak | k=rsa; t=s; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDPtW5iwpXVPiH5FzJ7Nrl8USzuY9zqqzjE0D1r… |
- WarningDKIM selector "smtpapi" uses a 1024-bit key. Rotate to 2048 bits.
DMARC OK
v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:a@dmarc.facebookmail.com; pct=100
- Policy
p=reject- Applies to
- 100% of failing mail
- Aggregate reports
mailto:a@dmarc.facebookmail.com
- Warningdmarc.facebookmail.com has not published instagram.com._report._dmarc.dmarc.facebookmail.com, so receivers will discard aggregate reports sent there.
Mail exchange and extras
- OK No problems detected.
- MTA-STS
- Not published optional: enforces TLS for inbound mail
- TLS-RPT
- Not published
- BIMI
- Not published optional: brand logo in inboxes, requires p=quarantine or reject
How the grade is calculated
Score 95/100. SPF present and valid. SPF ends with -all. DKIM found (1 selector). DMARC present and valid. DMARC policy is reject. DMARC aggregate reporting enabled. SPF contributes up to 35 points, DKIM up to 25, DMARC up to 40 (policy strength and reporting). Any critical issue caps the grade at C. Lookups that failed are shown as "not measured" and never counted as missing.
Check another domain:
Other recently graded domains
Public checks from the last few days. Every report is re-measured from DNS when opened.