bing.com
2 fixes stand between this domain and a clean A. 2 items below, ordered by how much inbox they are costing you. Measured 0s ago from public DNS in 145 ms.
Fix these, in this order, or hand the list to your agent
ranked by impactEither DKIM signing is off, or it uses a selector we did not probe. Without DKIM, forwarded mail and anything that breaks SPF fails DMARC.
Do this: in Microsoft 365 Defender go to Email & collaboration → Policies → DKIM, publish the two CNAME records (selector1 and selector2) and enable signing.
microsoft.com has not published bing.com._report._dmarc.microsoft.com, so receivers will discard aggregate reports sent there.
Do this: ask the report provider to publish the authorisation record, or use an address on your own domain.
Records found
Fix this with your AI agent
AGENT-READYA prompt built only from what was measured: the records as published, 2 tasks in order, exact record values and Azure DNS commands, guardrails, and how to verify. Paste it into Claude, Cursor, Copilot or ChatGPT.
# Fix email authentication for bing.com You are working on the DNS and mail configuration for bing.com. Measured by MailAuthWatch on 18 Oct 2026 from public DNS. Grade B (75/100). Report: https://www.mailauthwatch.com/check/bing.com ## What is published right now (do not assume anything else) - SPF (TXT bing.com): v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all — valid, 1 of 10 lookups - DMARC (TXT _dmarc.bing.com): v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:BingEmailDMARC@microsoft.com; - DKIM: no key found under 79 common selectors - MX: bing-com.mail.protection.outlook.com → Microsoft 365 - Nameservers: ns1-204.azure-dns.com, ns2-204.azure-dns.net … → records are managed in Azure DNS ## Tasks, in order of impact …
Grade history
SPF OK
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
- DNS lookups
- 1 of 10 allowed
- Final mechanism
-all
- OK No problems detected.
Include tree
1 / 10DKIM Not found
DKIM selectors cannot be listed from DNS, so 79 selectors used by common providers were probed. "Not found" means none of those selectors exist; the domain may still sign with a custom selector.
- WarningNo DKIM key found under 79 common selectors. If you know your selector, add it to the check; if you have no DKIM at all, enable it at your mail provider.
DMARC OK
v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:BingEmailDMARC@microsoft.com;
- Policy
p=reject- Applies to
- 100% of failing mail
- Aggregate reports
mailto:BingEmailDMARC@microsoft.com
- Warningmicrosoft.com has not published bing.com._report._dmarc.microsoft.com, so receivers will discard aggregate reports sent there.
Mail exchange and extras
- OK No problems detected.
- MTA-STS
- Not published optional: enforces TLS for inbound mail
- TLS-RPT
- Not published
- BIMI
- Not published optional: brand logo in inboxes, requires p=quarantine or reject
How the grade is calculated
Score 75/100. SPF present and valid. SPF ends with -all. DMARC present and valid. DMARC policy is reject. DMARC aggregate reporting enabled. SPF contributes up to 35 points, DKIM up to 25, DMARC up to 40 (policy strength and reporting). Any critical issue caps the grade at C. Lookups that failed are shown as "not measured" and never counted as missing.
Check another domain:
Other recently graded domains
Public checks from the last few days. Every report is re-measured from DNS when opened.